English 110: College Writing I

English 111: College Writing II

Humanities 110: Liberal Studies I

English 285: Special Topics – Love and the City (Rome, Italy Study Abroad Semester)

English 348C: Biographic Arts (LEAD Adult Degree Program)

 

 

English 110: College Writing I

Human Relationships

Ohio Dominican University, Fall Semester

Dr. Michelle Ruggaber Dougherty

 

 

Required Texts

1.

Axelrod, Rise B. and Charles R. Cooper. The St. Martin’s Guide to Writing, 7th ed. Short. Boston: Bedford St. Martin’s, 2004.

2.

Fitzgerald, F. Scott. Babylon Revisited” and Other Stories. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996.

3.

Great American Short Stories. Ed. Paul Negri. Mineola, NY: Dover, 2002. ISBN: 0486421198

4.

Jacobus, Lee A. A World of Ideas: Essential Readings for College Writers. Boston: Bedford St. Martin’s, 2002.

5.

Raimes, Ann. Universal Keys for Writers. 4th ed. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2005, with accompanying CD.

6.

Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray. 1891. Ed. Isobel Murray. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998. ISBN: 0192833650

7.

Selected readings on reserve at Spangler Learning Center

 

Course Requirements

Out of 500 Points

Grading Scale

 

 

 

Five responses

15 points each

A

95-100

C

73-76

Rhetorical analysis

100 points

A-

92-94

C-

70-72

Literary analysis

125 points

B+

89-91

D+

68-69

Argument paper

125 points

B

84-88

D

65-67

Oral Presentation

25 points

B-

80-83

D-

60-64

Final Exam

50 points

C+

77-79

F

59 and below

 

Course Description

English 110 is a beginning composition course designed to provide students with the writing skills necessary to succeed in college and their individual careers. In this section of the course, we will explore different dimensions of human relationships through a series of discussions and writing assignments. Students will also learn Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, and begin to use the MLA method of documentation and the Internet as a research tool in preparation for other courses and English 111. All students will be expected to participate in peer review workshop sessions and will be required to make a short presentation to the class.

 

Table of Contents

Course Policies

Brief Description of Assignments

Departmental Plagiarism Policy

Grading Standards and Guidelines

Course Calendar

 

 

Course goals and objectives

1. To develop in students an understanding of the power and pragmatism of precise language, students will:

v      Identify and exhibit a working knowledge of correct Standard English.

v      Recognize logical development in their own writing and the writing of others.

v      Internalize the power of writing concisely and logically.

v      Recognize theses in their own work and that of others.

v      Identify various rhetorical strategies.

 


2. To prepare students for the information revolution by encouraging the development of basic computer literacy, students will:

v      Demonstrate basic skills of MS Word and PowerPoint as tools for developing clear and accurate writing.

v      Exhibit a working knowledge of the basic tools for research using the Internet, databases, and other on-line research tools.

v      Identify the utility and limitations of computer tools.

 

3. To understand the Writing Process and that it is a recursive method, students will:

v      Distinguish prewriting skills.

v      Recognize the rationale of brainstorming.

v      Recognize the basic skills of drafting.

v      Internalize the value of editing and peer editing.

v      Comprehend that revision is essential to good writing.

v      Perceive the importance of the writing process in many situations, academic, career, personal, etc.

 

4. To introduce students to the research process, students will:

v      Recognize the importance of research to their writing and lifelong learning.

v      Comprehend the basic strategies for research.

v      Identify the characteristics of reliable source material.

 

5. To introduce students to the MLA method of documentation, students will:

v      Recognize the rationale for the MLA method of documentation.

v      Exhibit a working knowledge of documentation in their papers.

v      Recognize the dangers of plagiarism.

 

6. To develop in students an understanding of how language reflects and shapes cultural values, ideas, and movements, students will:

v      Identify the power of key pieces of writing in shaping human values.

v      Recognize the transference of culture and ideas through good writing.

v      Comprehend that writing can be a useful tool for learning.

 

Skills

7. To develop a functional proficiency in the English language, students will:

v      Identify the audience and purpose for their writing.

v      Become proficient in a variety of rhetorical strategies such as argumentation, comparison/contrast, etc.

v      Distinguish between formal and informal tone for varying audiences.

v      Develop a life-long habit of vocabulary building.

v      Formulate credible theses.

v      Provide support for their theses.

v      Use appropriate diction for varying audiences.

v      Use Standard English and syntax.

 

8. To demonstrate a working knowledge of the Writing Process, students will:

v      Demonstrate the ability to brainstorm both alone and in groups.

v      Draft papers.

v      Edit both their own work and the work of others.

v      Revise their work.

v      Proofread their work.

 

9. To develop in students the ability to think critically about what they are reading, students will:

v      Apply strategies of effective reading.

v      Use components of writing, including annotation to master texts.

v      Become discriminating and objective readers.

 

10. To develop in students the ability to perform research, students will:

v      Develop a short research paper.

v      Evaluate source material.

v      Use the Internet, research databases, and library catalogs.

v      Avoid plagiarism.

 

Attitudes and Values

11. To develop in students a respect for the power of the written word, students will:

v      Build lifelong reading habits.

v      Demonstrate an awareness of the impact of the written word history, society, and culture.

v      Understand that writing is a powerful tool.

v      Appreciate the impact of the written word on their lives, careers, and education.

 

12. To encourage a life-long appreciation of the writing as a powerful humanizing tool, students will:

v      Express their own insights about the power of the written word throughout history and in society, culture, and their own lives.

v      Read literary works and important essays that demonstrate how ideas as shaped by words are agents of change in history, society, and personal development.

 

13. To support development of good judgment in the quality of written expression, students will:

v      Demonstrate an awareness of the varying characteristics and forms of written expression by completing a variety of writing assignments.

v      Develop an appreciation for clarity, insight, organization, style, and creativity in written expression.

 

Course Policies

 

Peer review workshops

Before each major writing assignment is due, students are required to participate in the peer review workshop. Failure to participate in the workshop either through absence or through lack of preparation will result in the loss of one letter grade for the paper.

 

Late assignments

Deadlines are part of life and the writing process. Late papers will be penalized one-third of a grade for each day that they are late. Assignments are due on the day that they appear on the calendar. If you know in advance that you will be absent from a class, you must make arrangements to turn in your paper early.

 

Electronic submission of written work

Any written work may be submitted to me by e-mail, but it must be either in the body of the e-mail, attached as a Microsoft Word document, or saved in RTF. I will not accept attachments in any format other than these.

 

E-mail

All students are required to activate and check regularly their Ohio Dominican University e-mail accounts. If I need to contact you outside of class, I will do so through your ODU account.

 

Attendance and civility in the classroom

This course is not designed merely to convey information to be memorized.  It is designed to cultivate the habit of arguing and writing intelligently about important questions.  Being active in class discussions is crucial to developing this habit and disposition.  Therefore, attendance is required, and your grade may be lowered by one-third grade (e.g., a B- to a C+) for each absence after three, regardless of the reason for the absence. This policy includes illnesses.  Mere physical presence in class does not satisfy the attendance requirement.  If you appear to sleep, to work on other subjects, or to talk without permission during class, you may be marked absent for that day.  You should be seated and ready for class when class begins.

 

Academic honesty

Plagiarism is a serious moral offense. All written work must be formatted and documented in MLA Style. Students who plagiarize will fail the class. See the English Division Plagiarism Statement below. We will discuss these issues at length before the first major writing assignment is due. Further, all written work submitted for credit in this class must be written originally for this class. Please see the instructor if you have concerns. Ignorance of the standards of academic honesty is not an acceptable excuse for violating these standards. Students who commit any academic dishonesty—intentionally or unintentionally—will be penalized.

 

Students will be required to submit electronic versions of their papers to Turnitin.com.

 

The Write Place

All students should make good use of The Write Place, the writing center located in Spangler Learning Center, 206B. Writing specialists are available to assist students in the writing process, including thesis development, organization, punctuation, and MLA questions. Visitors to The Write Place can expect lively conversation and collaboration in these one-on-one sessions. No appointment is necessary. Hours are Mon - Thurs 9 a.m. to 10 p.m., Fri. 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., and Sat. 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

 

Assessment activities

As part of the English Division’s ongoing self-assessment research, all students will be required to complete a diagnostic essay (at both the beginning and the end of the semester) to submit graded copies of their papers.

 

Students with disabilities

Students who have documented their disabilities with the Dean of Student Resources are encouraged to meet privately with the instructor to discuss arrangements for their approved accommodations.

 

Conferences

I enjoy meeting with my students for a private conference; I find individual conferences to be extremely productive and well-worth the time, both for me and for the student. If at any time during the semester you have concerns about a class policy or procedure or your performance in the class, please set up a time to meet with me.

 

Brief Description of Writing Assignments

Note: All writing assignments must be turned in at the start of class. Always type your final drafts. You must use Times New Roman, 12 point, font. You must use 1” margins, and format your first page exactly like the sample on Keys 173. Use the ViewàHeader/Footer menus to insert your last name and the page number on each page.

 

Responses

Each 1-2 page response should have two elements. First, identify an issue related to relationships that you noticed during your reading and briefly explain how that issue is presented in the text. Next, respond to the issue. What problems do you see with how the issue is treated in the text? How do you see the issue at work in the world around you? Ideally, these responses should help you explore possible paper topics. You will be evaluated on clarity, organization, and level of critical thinking.

 

Rhetorical analysis

Choose from any of the essays (excluding the poetry and short stories) we will read this semester, except King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” which we will use in class as an example for how to write the paper. In 1-2 paragraphs, impartially summarize the author’s argument and main points. In the rest of the paper, analyze how the author makes his or her point by paying close attention to the rhetorical techniques he or she uses. Your paper should be about 4 pages in total length.

 

Literary analysis

In 4-6 pages, develop a thesis that answers a complex question you will pose about one of the works of literature (fiction or poetry) we have read.

 

Optional Re-write of either Argument or Rhetorical Analysis Paper

You may choose to re-write either of your first two major papers if you would like a chance to improve your grade. You should re-submit your original graded paper along with your substantially revised version. Your re-write must be a revised version of your original; you may not write an entirely different paper. Your new grade will be averaged with your old grade. I strongly encourage you to meet with me before you begin work on this so I can help you plan your revisions.

 

Argument

In 4-6 pages, write an argument paper about an issue related to the themes of this course. Your argument may take the form of an analysis (why something is the way it is) or a proposal (why people should do something). You must use at least three outside sources in your argument, and all sources must be documented fully and correctly according to MLA conventions.

 

Final Exam 

Students will be asked to identify definitions, grammar rules, and other writing techniques in the first half of the exam.  The second half of the exam will be a brief essay related to the diagnostic essay. This will be provided by the department.

 

Oral Presentations

Based upon their long research paper, students will offer oral presentations using PowerPoint software.

 

Participation

Your mere presence in class will not result in a passing participation grade. Participation will be based on your level of preparation for class (including bringing your books to class), your punctuality in turning in assignments, and your readiness to say something thoughtful about each day’s reading assignments.

 

English Division Plagiarism Policy

According to the Ohio Dominican University Student Handbook, “When a student submits work purporting to be his/her own, but which borrows ideas, organization, wording, or anything else from some other source without an appropriate acknowledgment of that fact, the student is guilty of plagiarism.”  

 

Plagiarism can be either unintentional or intentional.  Unintentional plagiarism is the result of faulty citation procedures, and English 110 and 111 are designed to provide you with the knowledge and experience to cite sources properly.  Students who did not take these courses at Ohio Dominican University are responsible for familiarizing themselves with appropriate methods of documentation.

 

Intentional plagiarism is another matter.  Writers who knowingly submit someone else’s writing as their own are guilty of the most serious of academic offenses.  It can damage, even end, a career in academics, business, or public life.  A record of college plagiarism can follow a student after graduation as surely as a record of grades.  More importantly, plagiarists do not understand the very idea of academic study and are helping to destroy its fundamental integrity.  Plagiarism undermines the validity of course grades and so cheats the academic institution, future employers, and the majority of students who do their own work at the cost of their valuable time and effort.

 

Intentional plagiarism will be dealt with severely in this course.  Students who plagiarize will receive an “F” as a final grade, and no excuses whatsoever will be accepted.  A common excuse after the discovery of plagiarism is that a friend or family member “helped” in the writing of the work submitted.  Such assistance is acceptable only at the level of review and advice—the same procedure that takes place in classroom peer review and through the assistance of an instructor.  Any use of another’s words or ideas must be cited or considered plagiarism.  The work submitted, while it may be reviewed for suggestions by others, must be your own, or must be properly cited if it is not.  See the Student Handbook for a full discussion of this issue.

 

The Worldwide Web has made the issue of plagiarism still more complex.  Essays on virtually every subject are available for sale or in library archives.  Be fully aware that college instructors know this, and they know the sites where such material can be downloaded.   

 

To avoid the entire problem of tracing sources, this course will employ the oral defense of student work, a standard procedure of graduate school study.  If the instructor determines that the student has plagiarized work, an oral defense of that work will be required.  Before the course instructor, the student will be asked to demonstrate a full knowledge of the essay.  That will include all the vocabulary used, the concepts discussed, the examples cited, and any other ideas or issues that the paper presents.  Such questions will be easy to answer for the original writer.  If the oral defense demonstrates that the work, or any part of it, is not the student’s own, the student will fail the course.

 

Grading Standards

Use these descriptions of the expectations for college-level writing as you write and revise your papers.

 

The A theme shows insight and the ability to state and develop a central idea. Its ideas are clear, logical, and thought provoking; it contains all the positive qualities of good writing listed below:

1. Careful construction and organization.

2. Careful choice of effective words and phrases.

3. Concentration on a main purpose with adequate development and firm support.

 

The B theme has a clearly stated central purpose which is logically and adequately developed. Its ideas are clear because it contains some of the positive qualities of good writing. It is comparatively free of errors in the use of good English. Although indicating some competence, the B paper lacks that insight and style which characterizes the A paper.

 

The average theme will receive a grade of C. It has a central idea organized clearly enough to convey its purpose to the reader. It avoids serious errors in the use of English. It may, in fact, have few correction marks on it, but it lacks the vigor of thought and expression which would entitle it to an above-average rating.

 

The grade of D indicates below-average achievement in expressing ideas correctly and effectively. Most D themes contain serious errors in the use of English and fail to present a central idea or to develop it adequately. A D theme may also contain a significant lack of evidence for the claims posited within the theme. With more careful proof-reading and fuller development, many D themes might be worth at least a C rating.

 

The grade of F usually indicates failure to state and develop a main idea. It may also indicate failure to avoid serious errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure.

 

 

Course Calendar

Please note: Assignments are due on the day on which they appear on the calendar. This calendar is subject to revision (with due notice) at any point during the semester.

 

Monday, August 23

Introductions

Reading rhetorically and rhetorical contexts

Diagnostic essay

Wednesday, August 25

Rousseau, “The Origin of Civil Society,” Ideas, 53-72

Jefferson, “The Declaration of Independence,” Ideas, 75-81

Discussion of expectations for responses

Monday, August 30

Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience,” Ideas, 141-165

King, “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Ideas, 179-197

Response #1 due

Wednesday, September 1

 “An Introduction to Critical Reading,” Ideas, 1-11

SMG, 583-608

Discussion of rhetorical analysis paper

Monday, September 6

Labor Day—No class

Wednesday, September 8

Douglass, “Narrative,” Ideas, 125-138

Jacobs, “Free at Last,” Ideas, 585-595

Strategies for drafting your paper—review SMG, 583-608

Response #2 due

Monday, September 13

Crèvecoeur, “What is an American,” Ideas, 537-560

Tocqueville, “Influence of Democratic Ideas,” Ideas, 565-581

Wednesday, September 15

Peer review

Complete draft of rhetorical analysis due

Monday, September 20

Revision skills: Paragraph organization

Topic sentences

Read and bring SMG, 611-623

Review Keys, 21-30 for background

Wednesday, September 22

Rhetorical analysis due

In-class reading: excerpts from Lewis, The Screwtape Letters, on reserve at Spangler

Monday, September 27

Excerpt from The Book of Job, Ideas, 665-686

Excerpt from The Gospel according to Matthew, Ideas, 691-700

Wednesday, September 29

Starting a research project: Read and bring SMG 295-305

Review Keys 79-85 for background

Come to class with a possible topic

Monday, October 4

Finding and evaluating reliable sources: Keys 85-115

Workshop with a librarian

Paper proposal due

Wednesday, October 6

Wollstonecraft, “Pernicious Effects,” Ideas, 782-792

Gilligan, “Woman’s Place,” Ideas, 835-855

Response #3 due—Identify one claim/reason pair from one of these essays. Explain how the author develops the reason. Discuss whether or not you find that claim/reason convincing.

Monday, October 11

Writing an argument: Read and bring Keys 44-66; 128-138

Review SMG 677-692 for background

Make any notes you have taken or research you have done available for class use.

Wednesday, October 13

Proposal and analysis arguments: SMG 352-377 and 466-491

Response #4 due—Briefly summarize a source you’ve found. Identify the thesis and audience of the source. Discuss whether or not you think it is a reliable source to use for your paper, and why.

Monday, October 18

Midterm break—No class

Wednesday, October 20

Revision skills: Citations, attributive tags, and source integration

Bring Keys

Monday, October 25

Peer review

Complete draft of argument paper due

Wednesday, October 27

Argument paper due

In-class readings: Levertov, “Letter to a Friend”

Chopin, “Story of an Hour,” SMG, 509-511

Monday, November 1

Horney, “The Distrust between the Sexes,” Ideas, 357-371

Discussion of literary analysis paper

Wednesday, November 3

“Writing about Literature,” read and bring SMG, 537-552

Review Keys, 67-72 for background

Avoiding plot summary

Monday, November 8

Fitzgerald, “Babylon Revisited,” BR

Wednesday, November 10

Fitzgerald, “The Ice Palace,” BR

Monday, November 15

Fitzgerald, “Absolution,” BR

Come to class with a topic idea for literary analysis paper

Paper proposal due

Wednesday, November 17

Plagiarism review

Response #5 due—Use the prompts on SMG, 543-546 to test some ideas for your literary analysis paper.

Monday, November 22

Discussion of in-class presentations, SMG, 847-851

Introduction to PowerPoint

Wednesday, November 24

Thanksgiving break—No class

Monday, November 29

Revision skills: Following conventions of literary analysis

Using detailed evidence

Bring as much of a draft as you have and SMG

Wednesday, December 1

Peer review

Complete draft of literary analysis due

Monday, December 6

Literary analysis due

In-class presentations begin

Wednesday, December 8

In-class presentations continue

Final exam review

Wednesday, December 15

Final exam, 2-3:50 pm

 

 

 

 

 

English 111: College Writing II

Other Times and Other Places

Ohio Dominican University, Spring Semester

Dr. Michelle Ruggaber Dougherty

 

 

Required Texts

1.

Booth, Wayne C., Gregory C. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams. The Craft of Research. 2nd ed. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003. ISBN: 0226065685

2.

Fadiman, Anne. The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1997. ISBN: 0374525641

3.

Great American Short Stories. Ed. Paul Negri. Mineola, NY: Dover, 2002. ISBN: 0486421198

4.

Longknife, Ann and K. D. Sullivan. The Art of Styling Sentences. 4th ed. New York: Barron’s, 2002. ISBN: 0764121812

5.

Raimes, Ann. Universal Keys for Writers. 4th ed. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2005, with accompanying CD.

6.

Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray. 1891. Ed. Isobel Murray. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998. ISBN: 0192833650

7.

Selected readings on reserve at Spangler Learning Center

 

Course Requirements

 

Grading Scale

 

 

 

Argument paper

20%

A

95-100

C

73-76

Literary Analysis paper

20%

A-

92-94

C-

70-72

Research Paper

30%

B+

89-91

D+

68-69

Short Assignments/Quizzes

15%

B

84-88

D

65-67

Oral Presentation

5%

B-

80-83

D-

60-64

Participation

2%

C+

77-79

F

59 and below

Final Exam

8%

 

 

 

 

 

Course Description

Briefly, ENG 111 presents students with the opportunity to refine and develop their writing skills, as well as introducing them to the process of research using the library, various means of technological support, and the MLA style.  

 

Table of Contents

Course Policies

Brief Description of Assignments

Departmental Plagiarism Policy

Grading Standards and Guidelines

Course Calendar MWF, sections 7 and 9

Course Calendar TTh, section 17   

 

Course goals and objectives

Knowledge

1.      To develop in students an understanding of the power and pragmatism of precise language, students will continue to:

·         Identify and exhibit a working knowledge of correct Standard English.

·         Recognize logical development in their writing and the writing of others.

·         Internalize the power of writing concisely and logically.

·         Recognize theses in their own work and that of others.

·         Identify various rhetorical strategies.

 

2.      To prepare students for the information revolution by encouraging the development of basic computer literacy, students will continue to:

·         Demonstrate basic skills of MS Word and PowerPoint as tools for developing clear and accurate writing.

·         Exhibit a working knowledge of the basic tools for research using the Internet, databases, and other on-line research tools and identify the utility and limitations of computer tools.    

3.      To understand the discursive quality of the Writing Process, students will continue to:

·         Distinguish prewriting skills.

·         Recognize the rationale of brainstorming.

·         Recognize the basic skills of drafting.

·         Internalize the value of editing and peer revising.

·         Comprehend that revision is essential to good writing.

·         Perceive the importance of good writing in many situations, academic, career, personal, etc.

 

4.      To develop in students an understanding of how language reflects and shapes cultural values, ideas, and movements, students will continue to:

·          Identify the power of writing in shaping human values.

·         Recognize the transference of culture and ideas through good writing.

·         Comprehend that writing can be a useful tool for learning.

 

5.      To develop in students a greater understanding of the research process, students will:

·         Recognize the importance of research to their writing and lifelong learning.

·         Comprehend strategies for research.

·         Recognize the difference between primary and secondary sources.

·         Identify the characteristics of reliable source material.

 

6.      To develop in students the MLA method of documentation, students will:

·         Continue to understand the rationale for the MLA method of documentation.

·         Continue to demonstrate the ability to document source materials in their papers.

·         Continue to recognize the dangers of plagiarism.

 

Skills

7.      To develop a functional proficiency in the English language, students will:

·         Continue to identify the audience and purpose for their writing.

·         Continue to become proficient in a variety of rhetorical strategies such as argumentation, comparison/contrast, etc.

·         Continue to distinguish between formal and informal tone for varying audiences. 

·         Continue to develop a life-long habit of vocabulary building.

·         Continue to formulate credible theses and provide support for their theses.

·         Continue to use appropriate diction for varying audiences.

·         Exhibit appropriate style, tone, vocabulary, sentence structure, and paragraph development.

 

8.      To demonstrate a working knowledge of the Writing Process, students will:

·         Exhibit a more mature ability to brainstorm, draft, edit, revise and publish.

·         Use secondary sources in the writing process.

 

9.      To learn to write from secondary sources, students will:

·         Write credible summaries, paraphrases, and abstracts.

·         Identify materials that have been plagiarized.

·         Use quotations accurately and appropriately.  

·         Use MLA Documentation Format.

·         Construct an argument using secondary sources.

·         Avoid plagiarism.

 


10.  To develop the ability to think critically about what they are reading. Students will:

·         Develop skills for close reading

·         Explore ways to incorporate the writing process into critical reading through techniques such as annotating. 

·         Apply logical and critical thinking skills to texts under their consideration.

·         Assess the credibility of secondary sources.

·         Demonstrate reading competency in a variety of genres such as novels, short Stories, and essays.

 

 

Attitudes and Values

11.  To develop a respect for the power of the written word, students will:

·         Build lifelong reading habits.

·         Demonstrate an awareness of the impact of the written word on history, society, and culture.

·         View writing as a major force in the development of history, society, and culture.

 

12.  To encourage a life-long appreciation of writing as a powerful tool.

·         Express their insights about the power of the written word throughout history.

·         Demonstrate how ideas as shaped by words are agents of change in history, culture, society, and personal development.

 

13.  To support the development of good judgment about the quality of written expression, students will:

·         Demonstrate an awareness of the varying characteristics of written expression.

·         Develop an appreciation for clarity, insight, organization, and creativity in written expression.

·         Demonstrate the ability to discern the reliability of secondary sources.

 

Course Policies

 

Peer review workshops

Before each major writing assignment is due, students are required to participate in the peer review workshop. Failure to participate in the workshop either through absence or through lack of preparation will result in the loss of one letter grade for the paper.

 

Late assignments

Deadlines are part of life and the writing process. Late papers will be penalized one-third of a grade for each day that they are late. Assignments are due on the day that they appear on the calendar. If you know in advance that you will be absent from a class, you must make arrangements to turn in your paper early.

 

Electronic submission of written work

Any written work may be submitted to me by e-mail, but it must be either in the body of the e-mail, attached as a Microsoft Word document, or saved in RTF. I will not accept attachments in any format other than these.

 

Quizzes

There will be several unannounced quizzes this semester, based on reading material and class material. No makeup quizzes will be available.  When quizzes are unannounced, giving makeup quizzes would give students who miss class an advantage over students who attend class.  Even when quizzes are announced, only a few questions make good quiz questions, and I use the best ones on the quizzes given during class.  If I used the same questions on makeup quizzes, students would have an incentive to miss class in order to have an advantage on makeup quizzes.  If I used different questions, the makeup quizzes would not accurately measure how well students know the material.  Other students’ grades will not hurt your grade, so you will not be treated unfairly if you need to drop a quiz because of an unavoidable absence while other students drop quizzes on which they received low grades.

 

E-mail

All students are required to activate and check regularly their Ohio Dominican University e-mail accounts. If I need to contact you outside of class, I will do so through your ODU account.

 

Attendance and civility in the classroom

This course is not designed merely to convey information to be memorized.  It is designed to cultivate the habit of arguing and writing intelligently about important questions.  Being active in class discussions is crucial to developing this habit and disposition.  Therefore, attendance is required, and your grade may be lowered by one-third grade (e.g., a B- to a C+) for each absence after three, regardless of the reason for the absence. This policy includes illnesses.  Mere physical presence in class does not satisfy the attendance requirement.  If you appear to sleep, to work on other subjects, or to talk without permission during class, you may be marked absent for that day.  You should be seated and ready for class when class begins.

 

Academic honesty

Plagiarism is a serious moral offense. All written work must be formatted and documented in MLA Style. Students who plagiarize will fail the class. See the English Division Plagiarism Statement below. We will discuss these issues at length before the first major writing assignment is due. Further, all written work submitted for credit in this class must be written originally for this class. Please see the instructor if you have concerns. Ignorance of the standards of academic honesty is not an acceptable excuse for violating these standards. Students who commit any academic dishonesty—intentionally or unintentionally—will be penalized.

 

Students will be required to submit electronic versions of their papers to Turnitin.com.

 

The Write Place

All students should make good use of The Write Place, the writing center located in Spangler Learning Center, 206B. Writing specialists are available to assist students in the writing process, including thesis development, organization, punctuation, and MLA questions. Visitors to The Write Place can expect lively conversation and collaboration in these one-on-one sessions. No appointment is necessary. Hours are Mon - Thurs 9 a.m. to 10 p.m., Fri. 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., and Sat. 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

 

Assessment activities

As part of the English Division’s ongoing self-assessment research, all students will be required to complete a diagnostic essay (at both the beginning and the end of the semester) to submit graded copies of their papers.

 

Students with disabilities

Students who have documented their disabilities with the Dean of Student Resources are encouraged to meet privately with the instructor to discuss arrangements for their approved accommodations.

 

Conferences

I enjoy meeting with my students for a private conference; I find individual conferences to be extremely productive and well-worth the time, both for me and for the student. If at any time during the semester you have concerns about a class policy or procedure or your performance in the class, please set up a time to meet with me.

 

Brief Description of Writing Assignments

Note: All writing assignments must be turned in at the start of class. Always type your final drafts. You must use Times New Roman, 12 point, font. You must use 1” margins, and format your first page exactly like the sample on Keys 173. Use the ViewàHeader/Footer menus to insert your last name and the page number on each page.

 

Diagnostic Essay

This is a 300-word in-class essay on a topic determined by the instructor.  It is not worth any points toward your final grade.  It is meant to help students and instructors determine the strengths and weaknesses of student writing.

 

Argument Paper

This is a thesis and support essay.  You propose an argumentative thesis or main point and support it using logic, examples, details, etc.  Extensive research is not necessary.

 

Literary Analysis

In this paper, you will offer an objective interpretation of the work of literature, perhaps by analyzing character, imagery, themes, etc.  You will need to use the MLA citation strategies.

 

Optional Re-write of either Literary Analysis or Argument Paper

You may choose to re-write either of your first two major papers if you would like a chance to improve your grade. You should re-submit your original graded paper along with your substantially revised version by April 3/4. Your re-write must be a revised version of your original; you may not write an entirely different paper. Your new grade will be averaged with your old grade. I strongly encourage you to meet with me before you begin work on this so I can help you plan your revisions.

 

Short Assignments

You will be asked to write a number of shorter assignments, including proposals, an annotated bibliography, sentence style, and critical notebook entries. Any quizzes will also fall in this category.

 

Long Research Paper

Students will write a lengthy researched argument paper, using several references from a variety of sources. 

 

Final Exam 

Students will be asked to identify definitions, grammar rules, and other writing techniques in the first half of the exam.  The second half of the exam will be a brief essay related to the diagnostic essay. This will be provided by the department.

 

Oral Presentations

Based upon their long research paper, students will offer oral presentations using PowerPoint software.

 

Participation

Your mere presence in class will not result in a passing participation grade. Participation will be based on your level of preparation for class (including bringing your books to class), your punctuality in turning in assignments, and your readiness to say something thoughtful about each day’s reading assignments.

 

English Division Plagiarism Policy

According to the Ohio Dominican University Student Handbook, “When a student submits work purporting to be his/her own, but which borrows ideas, organization, wording, or anything else from some other source without an appropriate acknowledgment of that fact, the student is guilty of plagiarism.”  

 

Plagiarism can be either unintentional or intentional.  Unintentional plagiarism is the result of faulty citation procedures, and English 110 and 111 are designed to provide you with the knowledge and experience to cite sources properly.  Students who did not take these courses at Ohio Dominican University are responsible for familiarizing themselves with appropriate methods of documentation.

 

Intentional plagiarism is another matter.  Writers who knowingly submit someone else’s writing as their own are guilty of the most serious of academic offenses.  It can damage, even end, a career in academics, business, or public life.  A record of college plagiarism can follow a student after graduation as surely as a record of grades.  More importantly, plagiarists do not understand the very idea of academic study and are helping to destroy its fundamental integrity.  Plagiarism undermines the validity of course grades and so cheats the academic institution, future employers, and the majority of students who do their own work at the cost of their valuable time and effort.

 

Intentional plagiarism will be dealt with severely in this course.  Students who plagiarize will receive an “F” as a final grade, and no excuses whatsoever will be accepted.  A common excuse after the discovery of plagiarism is that a friend or family member “helped” in the writing of the work submitted.  Such assistance is acceptable only at the level of review and advice—the same procedure that takes place in classroom peer review and through the assistance of an instructor.  Any use of another’s words or ideas must be cited or considered plagiarism.  The work submitted, while it may be reviewed for suggestions by others, must be your own, or must be properly cited if it is not.  See the Student Handbook for a full discussion of this issue.

 

The Worldwide Web has made the issue of plagiarism still more complex.  Essays on virtually every subject are available for sale or in library archives.  Be fully aware that college instructors know this, and they know the sites where such material can be downloaded.   

 

To avoid the entire problem of tracing sources, this course will employ the oral defense of student work, a standard procedure of graduate school study.  If the instructor determines that the student has plagiarized work, an oral defense of that work will be required.  Before the course instructor, the student will be asked to demonstrate a full knowledge of the essay.  That will include all the vocabulary used, the concepts discussed, the examples cited, and any other ideas or issues that the paper presents.  Such questions will be easy to answer for the original writer.  If the oral defense demonstrates that the work, or any part of it, is not the student’s own, the student will fail the course.

 

Grading Standards

Use these descriptions of the expectations for college-level writing as you write and revise your papers.

 

The A theme shows insight and the ability to state and develop a central idea. Its ideas are clear, logical, and thought provoking; it contains all the positive qualities of good writing listed below:

1. Careful construction and organization.

2. Careful choice of effective words and phrases.

3. Concentration on a main purpose with adequate development and firm support.

 

The B theme has a clearly stated central purpose which is logically and adequately developed. Its ideas are clear because it contains some of the positive qualities of good writing. It is comparatively free of errors in the use of good English. Although indicating some competence, the B paper lacks that insight and style which characterizes the A paper.

 

The average theme will receive a grade of C. It has a central idea organized clearly enough to convey its purpose to the reader. It avoids serious errors in the use of English. It may, in fact, have few correction marks on it, but it lacks the vigor of thought and expression which would entitle it to an above-average rating.

 

The grade of D indicates below-average achievement in expressing ideas correctly and effectively. Most D themes contain serious errors in the use of English and fail to present a central idea or to develop it adequately. A D theme may also contain a significant lack of evidence for the claims posited within the theme. With more careful proof-reading and fuller development, many D themes might be worth at least a C rating.

 

The grade of F usually indicates failure to state and develop a main idea. It may also indicate failure to avoid serious errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure.

 

Twenty Guidelines for Writing Argumentative Essays

If you follow these twenty guidelines, you will avoid some of the most common mistakes among college students.

 

1.      Do not use other people’s ideas without documenting the source. All quotes, paraphrases, and summaries of both primary and secondary sources must be documented. See the page on documenting sources and academic honesty.

2.      Provide proper citations when you report someone’s position.  Imagine that your reader doubts the accuracy of your statements about the other person’s position so that you need to identify specific texts to verify these statements.  Essays that violate this rule often receive low grades, because such essays often are inaccurate.  For example, if you try to find a citation to support the statement “Aristotle says that wealth is identical to happiness,” you will find that Aristotle denies that wealth is identical to happiness. 

3.      Follow the assignment.  Brilliant essays that do not complete the assignment will receive low grades.

4.      Give evidence to defend important assertions.  Asserting something does not make it true.  Likewise, saying that you strongly believe, personally believe, or just believe something does not make it true.  An argumentative essay differs from forms of writing that sometimes do not require arguments, such as reflection papers, autobiographies, poems, Stories, and works of fiction.

5.      Do not use quotations or paraphrases as substitutes for arguments and explanations.  Citing a passage does not excuse you from explaining it, defending it, and showing how it strengthens your essay.  For example, if you write, “As Aristotle says in his Nicomachean Ethics, finding the function of a human being will show us what happiness is” (1.7), then you should explain what Aristotle means, give evidence to support his statement, and show how his statement strengthens your essay.

6.      Use clear and precise language, not vague, imprecise, or fancy language.  Strong arguments and clear explanations will impress your instructor; fancy words will not.  For example, do not write, “In the warp and woof of human existence, not a few people take detours from the path of truth.”  A clearer way of expressing the same idea is, “People sometimes make mistakes.”  An intelligent person who is unfamiliar with your topic should be able to understand your writing.  To satisfy this standard, you should start by understanding the material that your essay discusses.  Students who try to write essays without understanding the material almost always fail.

7.      Follow a clear outline, and do not add material without clearly explaining how it strengthens your essay.  Eliminate any word, sentence, or section that does not strengthen your essay.  Readers should not have to guess about why a part of your essay is relevant.

8.      Do not rely on dictionaries to define important terms.  The lexicographers who define terms such as immoral or God usually give bland definitions that will not strengthen your essay.

9.      Read your essay out loud, and imagine reading it to an intelligent person who is unfamiliar with your topic and who does not want to work hard at deciphering what you write.  (Your instructor fits the second part of this description.)  You probably will overlook problems when you read your paper silently.

10.  Use your word processing program to check the spelling and grammar.  Your word processing program should be able to identify many of the mistakes on the next page.

11.  Do not use they, their, them, or themselves as singular pronouns, and remember that that the word themself is not a word in standard written English.  Anybody, anyone, each, either, everybody, everyone, neither, one, somebody, and someone are singular pronouns.  This mistake is the most common grammatical mistake in college students’ writing.  For example, do not write, “If someone agrees with Ayer, then they are mistaken.”  Some people say that using they or their as singular pronouns has become acceptable.  Your instructor disagrees.

12.  Do not use comma splices, run–on sentences, or sentence fragments, and do not confuse a comma (,) with a semicolon (;).  For example, do not write, “Abraham Lincoln was poor as a child, however he became president” or “However he became evident.”  A comma may not be used to connect independent clauses (i.e., clauses that could be complete sentences on their own).  The following words should be preceded by a semicolon when used to connect clauses of a compound sentence: then, however, thus, hence, indeed, accordingly, besides, therefore. Also, remember that “being” is not by itself a complete verb. A phrase that uses “being” as the sole verb is a fragment, not a complete sentence.

13.  Avoid unclear uses of it, that, or this.  For example, do not write, “Kant argues that people should live according to reason.  In Kant’s moral theory, it all comes down to that.”

14.  Remember that most adverbs end in ly.  “Thieves act morally wrong” is incorrect; “Thieves act immorally” is correct.

15.  Do not use it’s or you’re as possessive pronouns or its and your as contractions for it is and you are.  “Your in danger, because the snake is rattling it’s tail, which means that its about to strike at you’re leg.” is incorrect; “You’re in danger, because the snake is rattling its tail, which means that it’s about to strike at your leg” is correct.

16.  Use apostrophes correctly.  Adding s to the end of a word usually makes it plural, while adding ‘s usually makes the word possessive.  (It’s and its are two exceptions.)  “Aristotles argument’s against materialist’s” is incorrect; “Aristotle’s arguments against materialists” is correct.

17.  Do not confuse to effect and to affect or effect and affect.  To effect something is to cause it to exist; to affect something is to influence it.  Aristotle’s arguments affected Aquinas, but they did not effect Aquinas.  Because these arguments affected Aquinas, they had an effect on him.

18.  Avoid unnecessary uses of personal and personally.  For example, do not write, “In my personal opinion, lying is immoral” or “I personally believe that lying is immoral.”

19.  Remember the difference between saying that a statement is true and saying that a statement is considered true and the difference between saying that an something is morally wrong and saying that the thing is considered morally wrong.

20.  Do not use I, we, he, she, or they as object pronouns.  People trying to sound more educated than they are commonly make this mistake.  “You spoke to he, she, and I” is incorrect; “You spoke to him, her and me” is correct.

 

Course Calendar (MWF—please scroll down for TTh schedule.)

Please note: Assignments are due on the day on which they appear on the calendar. This calendar is subject to revision (with due notice) at any point during the semester.

 

Wednesday, January 18

In-Class Work: Course introductions

Friday, January 20

Styling Sentences: SP 1 (including 1a-1c): Compound Sentence: Semicolon, No Conjunction, 7-11

In-Class Work: Introduction to critical reading

Critical response, personal response, argument, and analysis

Written diagnostic essay

Monday, January 23

Reading Assignment: “The Pitfall to Avoid at All Costs,” Craft, 201-207

Essays on reserve at Spangler Library: Plagiarism Readings 1, Plagiarism Readings 2, Professionalism in Writing

In-Class Work: Discussion of plagiarism and professionalism in writing

Wednesday, January 25

Reading Assignment: “The Tell-Tale Heart” and “The Yellow Wallpaper,” Stories, 13-17, 115-129

Styling Sentences: SP 3: Compound Sentence with Explanatory Statement, 15-18

In-Class Work: Introduction to argument paper assignment

Friday, January 27

Reading Assignment: Craft, 114-126; Spirit, 4-37

In-Class Work: Introduction to basic argument structures

Monday, January 30

Reading Assignment: Spirit, 38-59; “Lost Phoebe,” Stories, 179-191

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #1

In-Class Work: Continued discussion of basic argument structures

Wednesday, February 1

Reading Assignment: Craft, 127-150; Spirit, 60-92

Styling Sentences: SP 5: A Series of Balanced Pairs, 28-30

In-Class Work: Continued discussion of basic argument structures

Friday, February 3

Writing Assignment: Complete draft of argument paper due

In-Class Work: Peer review workshop of argument paper

Monday, February 6

Reading Assignment: Craft, 208-218

In-Class Work: Revision activities for your argument paper

Bring your draft and make an electronic version available for use in class

Wednesday, February 8

Writing Assignment: Final copy of argument paper due

In-Class Work: Introduction to research paper assignment

Brainstorming of possible topics

Friday, February 10

Reading Assignment: Craft, 9-31; Spirit, 93-118

Styling Sentences: SP 6: An Introductory Series of Appositives, 31-34

In-Class Work: Connecting with your readers

Monday, February 13

Reading Assignment: Craft, 37-53; Spirit, 119-139

In-Class Work: Developing topics

Styling Sentences: SP 7: An Internal Series of Appositives or Modifiers, 35-37

Wednesday, February 15

Reading Assignment: Craft, 56-71; Spirit, 140-170

In-Class Work: Continued development of topics

Friday, February 17

Reading Assignment: The Picture of Dorian Gray, “Preface” and Chapters 1-3

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #2

Monday, February 20

Reading Assignment: The Picture of Dorian Gray, Chapters 4-7

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #3

Wednesday, February 22

Reading Assignment: The Picture of Dorian Gray, Chapters 8-10

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #4

Friday, February 24

Reading Assignment: The Picture of Dorian Gray, Chapters 11-14          

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #5

Monday, February 27

Reading Assignment: The Picture of Dorian Gray, Chapters 15-end

“Writing about Literature,” Keys, 67-72

Wednesday, March 1

Styling Sentences: SP 10: Emphatic Appositive at End, After a Colon, 54-57

In-Class Work: In-Class Workshop on literary analysis paper

             Bring Dorian Gray and what you have so far written

Friday, March 3

Writing Assignment: Complete draft of literary analysis due

In-Class Work: Peer review workshop of literary analysis

Monday, March 6

Writing Assignment: Final copy of literary analysis of Dorian Gray due

In-Class Work: Introduction to doing research at ODU

                         Formation of research groups

Wednesday, March 8

Reading Assignment: Spirit, 171-209; “Using Sources,” Craft, 90-107

In-Class Work: Explanation of annotated bibliography         

Friday, March 10

Writing Assignment: CN #6: Proposal for long research paper

Styling Sentences: SP 11: Interrupting Modifier between Subject and Verb, 63-66

In-Class Work: In-class research workshop/evaluating sources (Know How)

Monday, March 13

No Class—Spring Break

Wednesday, March 15

No Class—Spring Break

Friday, March 17

No Class—Spring Break

Monday, March 20

Reading Assignment: Craft, 151-164; Spirit, 210-249

In-Class Work: Review of voice and connecting with audience

                         Review of ethos, pathos, logos

             Review of research as exploratory process

Wednesday, March 22

Writing Assignment: Annotated bibliography for research paper due         

In-Class Work: Research workshop

Friday, March 24

Reading Assignment: Craft, 165-181

Bring at least one source with you to class

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #7

In-Class Work: Responsible note taking and responses to sources

Monday, March 27

Reading Assignment: “Preparing to Draft,” Craft, 185-200

Styling Sentences: SP 16: Paired Constructions, 88-92

In-Class Work: Workshop outline development; make your notes available to use in class

Wednesday, March 29

Reading Assignment: Craft, 201-207

Writing Assignment: Outline of research paper due (at least 2 pages single spaced)

In-Class Work: Moving from an outline to a paper

Friday, March 31

Reading Assignment: Craft, 138-181 (review these pages we’ve read already)

In-Class Work: Review of structure of an argument

Monday, April 3

Reading Assignment: Spirit, 250-277

Writing Assignment: Optional re-write of either your argument paper or your literary analysis due. You may turn in your re-write before this date, if you would like to do so.

In-Class Work: Review of voice and connecting with audience

Wednesday, April 5

Reading Assignment: “Introductions and Conclusions,” Craft, 222-240; Spirit, 278-288

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #8

Friday, April 7

No Class—Dr. Dougherty will be attending the College English Association conference.

Monday, April 10

Reading Assignment: Keys, 122-136                 

In-Class Work: Smooth integration of sources

Review of citation issues

Bring whatever you have written on your draft and your Keys book

Wednesday, April 12

Writing Assignment: Complete draft (including citations and works cited page) of long research paper due

In-Class Work: Peer review workshop of draft

Friday, April 14

No Class—Good Friday

Monday, April 17

No Class—Easter Monday

Wednesday, April 19

In-Class Work: Revision activities for your research paper

Bring your draft and make an electronic version available for use in class

Friday, April 21

Reading Assignment: Craft, 263-282

In-Class Work: Revision activities for your research paper

Bring your draft and make an electronic version available for use in class

Monday, April 24

In-Class Work: Final copy of long research paper due

PowerPoint Presentations

Wednesday, April 26

In-Class Work: PowerPoint Presentations   

Friday, April 28

No Class—College English Association of Ohio conference at ODU

Monday, May 1

In-Class Work: PowerPoint Presentations   

Wednesday, May 3

In-Class Work: PowerPoint Presentations   

Friday, May 5

No Class—Dr. Dougherty will be attending the International Congress on Medieval Studies.

Monday, May 8

10:30 Class (section 7), Final Exam 10:00 – 11:50

11:45 Class (section 9), Final Exam 12:00 – 1:50

 

Course Calendar (TTh—please scroll up for MWF schedule.)

Please note: Assignments are due on the day on which they appear on the calendar. This calendar is subject to revision (with due notice) at any point during the semester.

 

Tuesday, January 17

In-Class Work: Course introductions

Written diagnostic essay

Thursday, January 19

Reading Assignment: “The Pitfall to Avoid at All Costs: Plagiarism,” Craft, 201-207

Essays on reserve at Spangler Library: Plagiarism Readings 1, Plagiarism Readings 2, Professionalism in Writing

Styling Sentences: SP 1 (including 1a-1c): Compound Sentence: Semicolon, No Conjunction, 7-11

In-Class Work: Introduction to critical reading

Critical response, personal response, argument, and analysis

Discussion of plagiarism and professionalism in writing

Tuesday, January 24

Reading Assignment: “The Tell-Tale Heart, ”“The Yellow Wallpaper,” and “Lost Phoebe,” Stories, 13-17, 115-129, 179-191

In-Class Work: Introduction to argument paper assignment

Thursday, January 26

Reading Assignment: Craft, 114-126; Spirit, 4-31

Styling Sentences: SP 3: Compound Sentence with Explanatory Statement, 15-18

In-Class Work: Continued work on basic argument structures

Tuesday, January 31

Reading Assignment: Craft, 127-150; Spirit, 32-59

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #1

In-Class Work: Continued work on basic argument structures

Thursday, February 2

Reading Assignment: Spirit, 60-92

Writing Assignment: Bring an electronic or hard copy version of your draft so far

Styling Sentences: SP 5: A Series of Balanced Pairs, 28-30

In-Class Work: Workshop and revision activities for argument paper

Tuesday, February 7

Reading Assignment: Craft, 208-218

Writing Assignment: Complete draft of argument paper due

In-Class Work: Peer review workshop of argument paper

Thursday, February 9

Writing Assignment: Final copy of argument paper due

In-Class Work: Introduction to research paper assignment

Brainstorming of possible topics

Introduction to research as a thinking activity

Tuesday, February 14

Reading Assignment: Spirit, 93-139; Skim Craft, 9-31

Styling Sentences: SP 6: An Introductory Series of Appositives, 31-34

In-Class Work: Connecting with your readers

Thursday, February 16

Reading Assignment: Spirit, 140-170; Skim Craft, 37-71  

Styling Sentences: SP 7: An Internal Series of Appositives or Modifiers, 35-37

In-Class Work: Developing topics

Tuesday, February 21

Reading Assignment: The Picture of Dorian Gray, “Preface” and Chapters 1-5

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #2

Thursday, February 23

Reading Assignment: The Picture of Dorian Gray, Chapters 6-12

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #3

Tuesday, February 28

Reading Assignment: The Picture of Dorian Gray, Chapters 13-end

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #4

Styling Sentences: SP 10: Emphatic Appositive at End, After a Colon, 54-57

In-Class Work: In-class workshop on literary analysis

Bring your draft and make an electronic version available for use in class

Thursday, March 2

Reading Assignment: “Writing about Literature,” Keys, 67-72

Writing Assignment: Complete draft of literary analysis of Dorian Gray due

In-Class Work: Peer review workshop of literary analysis

Revision activities for your literary analysis

Bring your draft and make an electronic version available for use in class

Tuesday, March 7

Writing Assignment: Final copy of literary analysis of Dorian Gray due

In-Class Work: Introduction to doing research at ODU

Explanation of annotated bibliography

Formation of research groups

Thursday, March 9

Reading Assignment: Spirit, 171-209; “Using Sources,” Craft, 90-107

Writing Assignment: CN #5: Proposal for research paper

In-Class Work: In-class research workshop/evaluating sources (Know How)

Tuesday, March 14

No Class—Spring Break

Thursday, March 16

No Class—Spring Break

Tuesday, March 21

Reading Assignment: Craft, 151-164; Spirit, 210-249

Styling Sentences: SP 11: Interrupting Modifier between Subject and Verb, 63-66

In-Class Work: Review of voice and connecting with audience

Review of ethos, pathos, logos

Review of research as exploratory process

Thursday, March 23

Reading Assignment: Craft, 151-181; Spirit, 210-249

Writing Assignment: Annotated bibliography for research paper due

In-Class Work: Responsible note taking

Bring at least one source with you to class

Research workshop

Tuesday, March 28

Reading Assignment: “Preparing to Draft,” Craft, 185-207

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #7

Styling Sentences: SP 16: Paired Constructions, 88-92

In-Class Work: Workshop outline development—make your notes available to use in class

Thursday, March 30

Reading Assignment: Craft, 138-181 (review these pages we’ve read already)

Writing Assignment: Outline of research paper due (at least 2 pages single spaced)

In-Class Work: Review of structure of an argument

Tuesday, April 4

Reading Assignment: Spirit, 250-288

Writing Assignment: Optional re-write of either your argument paper or your literary analysis due. You may turn in your re-write before this date, if you would like to do so.

In-Class Work: Review of voice and connecting with audience

Thursday, April 6

Reading Assignment: “Introductions and Conclusions,” Craft, 222-240

Writing Assignment: Critical notebook #8  

Tuesday, April 11

Reading Assignment: Keys, 122-136                

In-Class Work: Smooth integration of sources

Review of citation issues

Bring whatever you have written on your draft and your Keys book

Thursday, April 13

Writing Assignment: Complete draft (including citations and works cited page) of long research paper due

In-Class Work: Peer review workshop of draft

Tuesday, April 18

In-Class Work: Revision activities for your research paper

Bring your draft and make an electronic version available for use in class

Thursday, April 20

In-Class Work: Revision activities for your research paper

Bring your draft and make an electronic version available for use in class

Tuesday, April 25

Writing Assignment: Final copy of long research paper due

In-Class Work: PowerPoint Presentations

Thursday, April 27

In-Class Work: PowerPoint Presentations

Tuesday, May 2

In-Class Work: PowerPoint Presentations

Thursday, May 4

No Class—Dr. Dougherty will be attending the International Congress on Medieval Studies.

Tuesday, May 9

Final Exam 12-1:50.

 

 

 

Humanities 110: Liberal Studies I

Ohio Dominican University, Fall Semester

Dr. Michelle Ruggaber Dougherty

 

Please see the general program syllabus for the description, goals, and objectives of this course.

 

Course Requirements and Grading Scale

Point Value

Paper One

50

Paper Two

100

11 Quizzes (lowest dropped)

150 (15 points each)

Midterm

75

Final

75

Participation

50

 

A

96-100

475-500

A-

93-95

465-474

B+

89-92

445-464

B

85-88

425-444

B-

82-84

410-424

C+

79-81

395-409

C

75-78

375-394

C-

70-74

350-374

D+

68-69

340-349

D

65-67

325-339

D-

60-64

300-324

F

0-59

  0-299

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Course Policies

 

Quizzes

There will be 11 short, unannounced quizzes, the lowest of which will be dropped. The quizzes will be a combination of multiple choice, fill in the blank, and short essay. The material covered by each quiz may include any reading due in class that day, any reading we have done since the last quiz, and any material we have covered in class since the last quiz. Because the lowest quiz grade is dropped, there will be no make-up quizzes.

 

Participation

In order to achieve your full participation grade, you must do the following:

·         Treat me and your fellow classmates with respect.

·         Consistently arrive to class in enough time to be settled by the time we start.

·         Consistently come to class.

·         Bring all of the class materials we will be using each day.

·         Come to class having carefully read the material and prepared to say something thoughtful about what you have read.

·         Turn in all papers and assignments on time.

 

Late assignments

Deadlines are part of life and the writing process. Late papers will be penalized one-third of a grade for each day that they are late. Assignments are due on the day that they appear on the calendar. If you know in advance that you will be absent from a class, you must make arrangements to turn in your work early.

 

Exams and Essays

A midterm exam will be given on Friday, October 15; a comprehensive final will be given during exam week. You will also write two major essays that ask you to synthesize and analyze the material we are covering. Late papers will be penalized one grade for each class day that they are late. Both papers must be completed and submitted in order to pass the course.

 

E-mail

All students are required to activate and check regularly their Ohio Dominican University e-mail accounts. If I need to contact you outside of class, I will do so through your ODU account.

 

Attendance and civility in the classroom

Punctual class attendance and participation are required. Students are permitted three (3) absences, which should be reserved for illness, emergencies, or athletics. More than three absences will result in a drop in your final grade by one-half letter grade for each class past three that you miss. If you must miss class, please notify me in advance, or as soon as you can. I make no distinction between excused and unexcused absences.

 

Academic honesty

Please note that plagiarism and cheating can result in the failure of a paper, exam, quiz, or the entire course. I take plagiarism very seriously and will report all cases of plagiarism to the Director of the Humanities Program and to the Office of Academic Affairs. All sources, including the texts we are using in class, must be documented fully and completely according to MLA conventions. We will discuss these issues in class before the first paper is due.

 

Students with disabilities

Students who have documented their disabilities with the Dean of Student Resources are encouraged to meet privately with the instructor to discuss arrangements for their approved accommodations.

 

Conferences

I enjoy meeting with my students for a private conference; I find individual conferences to be extremely productive and well-worth the time, both for me and for the student. If at any time during the semester you have concerns about a class policy or procedure or your performance in the class, please set up a time to meet with me.

 

Course Calendar

Please note: Assignments are due on the day on which they appear on the calendar. This calendar is subject to revision (with due notice) at any point during the semester.

 

Monday, August 23

Introductions

Wednesday, August 25

“The Allegory of the Cave,” Coursepack

Friday, August 27

The Iliad, Book 1

Monday, August 30

The Iliad, Book 3

Wednesday, September 1

The Iliad, Book 6

Friday, September 3

“Odysseus’ Scar” on reserve at Spangler Learning Center

Monday, September 6

Labor Day—No Class

Wednesday, September 8

The Iliad, Book 9

Friday, September 10

The Iliad, Book 16; Discussion of Essay #1 assignment

Monday, September 13

The Iliad, Book 18

“From Myth to Philosophy,” Coursepack

Wednesday, September 15

The Iliad, Book 22

Friday, September 17

“Epic and Novel,” on reserve at Spangler Learning Center

Monday, September 20

The Iliad, Book 24

Wednesday, September 22

Antigone

Friday, September 24

Antigone                                        Essay #1 Due

Monday, September 27

Plato, “The Apology,” 37-67

Wednesday, September 29

The Aeneid, Book 1

Friday, October 1

The Aeneid, Book 2

Monday, October 4

The Aeneid, Book 4

Wednesday, October 6

The Aeneid, Book 6

Friday, October 8

The Aeneid, Book 7

Monday, October 11

The Aeneid, Book 8

Wednesday, October 13

Review for Midterm Exam

Friday, October 15

Midterm Exam

Monday, October 18

Midterm Break—No Class

Wednesday, October 20

The Aeneid, Book 12

Friday, October 22

Review and synthesis

Introduction to Job

Monday, October 25

The Book of Job, Chapters 1-14

Wednesday, October 27

Job, Chapters 28-37

Friday, October 29

Job, Chapters 38-42

“The Covenant of Faith” in Notes on Humanity, 23-40

Monday, November 1

“The Church and the Empire” in Notes on Humanity, 32-40

The Gospel of Matthew, Chapters 1-15

Wednesday, November 3

Matthew, Chapters 16-28

Friday, November 5

Parables of Matthew, review the parables in chapters 5, 7, 9, 13, 18, 20-22, and 25

Monday, November 8

“The Medieval Synthesis” in Notes on Humanity, 33-40

Augustine, Confessions, Book 1

Wednesday, November 10

Confessions, Book 2

Friday, November 12

Confessions, Book 3

Monday, November 15

Confessions, Book 4

Wednesday, November 17

“The Confessions: Theme and Pattern,” Coursepack

Discussion of Essay #2 assignment

Friday, November 19

Augustine, Confessions, Book 5

Monday, November 22

Confessions, Book 6

Wednesday, November 24

Thanksgiving Break—No Class

Friday, November 26

Thanksgiving Break—No Class

Monday, November 29

Confessions, Book 7

Wednesday, December 1

Confessions, Book 8

Friday, December 3

Confessions, Book 9

Monday, December 6

Catch-up and review

Wednesday, December 8

Catch-up and review                      Essay #2 Due

Friday, December 10

Review for Final Exam

Monday, December 13

Final Exam, 10:00-11:50 am

 

 

 

 

 

English 285: Special Topics – Love and the City

Ohio Dominican University, Fall Semester

Rome, Italy Campus

Dr. Michelle Ruggaber Dougherty

 

 

Required Texts

1.

Addison, Joseph. Cato: A Tragedy. Eds. Christine Dunn Henderson and Mark E. Yellin. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004. ISBN 0865974438

2.

de Staël, Germaine. Corinne, or Italy. Trans. Sylvia Raphael. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998. ISBN 0192825054

3.

Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Marble Faun. Ed. Susan Manning. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002. ISBN 0192839764

4.

James, Henry. Daisy Miller. Ed. Geoffrey Moore. London: Penguin, 1986. ISBN 0140432620

5.

Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Coriolanus. Ed. Reuben Brower. New York: Signet, 2002. ISBN 0451528433

6.

Virgil. The Aeneid. Trans. Robert Fitzgerald. New York: Vintage, 1990. ISBN 0679729526

7.

Selections from Romantic Poetry: An Anthology. Ed. Stanley Appelbaum. Mineola, NY: Dover, 1996. ISBN 0486292827

 

Course Requirements

 

Grading Scale

 

 

 

One 4-6 page paper

25%

A

95-100

C

73-76

Two 1-3 page papers

15%

A-

92-94

C-

70-72

Quizzes

25%

B+

89-91

D+

68-69

Participation

10%

B

84-88

D

65-67

Final Exam

25%

B-

80-83

D-

60-64

 

 

C+

77-79

F

59 and below

 

Course Description

In this course we will examine the interaction between the city as setting and character relationships. Throughout the course we will read works of literature from different time periods and of different genres and discuss the extent to which the Roman setting impacts relationships between characters—or possibly acts as a character itself. As each work we will study is either set in Rome or is significantly connected to Rome, students will be encouraged to make connections between the Rome they live in and the Rome depicted in each work. This course will be run as a seminar and will require strong student participation.

 

Course Policies

 

Quizzes

We will start nearly every class with a short quiz. The material covered by each quiz may include any reading due in class that day, any reading we have done since the last quiz, and any material we have covered in class since the last quiz. The lowest two quiz grades will be dropped, and there will be no make-up quizzes for absent or tardy students. Absence from class will result in a zero for that day’s quiz.

 

Participation

Your participation grade will be based on two elements. First, each student is expected to come to each class with several questions to start discussion. All students will be called on during every class, and all students are expected to be able to contribute a comment or question to further our discussion. Second, every student with give two in-class Scene Presentations. Each student will select a scene from the day’s reading that is important to our analysis, will read the scene aloud, will explain that scene’s importance, and will pose a few questions to stimulate discussion.

 

Late assignments

Deadlines are part of life and the writing process. Late papers will be penalized one-third of a grade for each day that they are late. Assignments are due on the day that they appear on the calendar. If you know in advance that you will be absent from a class, you must make arrangements to turn in your work early.

 

Electronic submission of written work

Any written work may be submitted to me by e-mail, but it must be either in the body of the e-mail or attached as a Microsoft Word document. I will not accept attachments in any format other than Microsoft Word.

 

E-mail

All students are required to activate and check regularly their Ohio Dominican University e-mail accounts. If I need to contact you outside of class, I will do so through your ODU account.

 

Attendance and civility in the classroom

This course is not designed merely to convey information to be memorized.  It is designed to cultivate the habit of arguing and writing intelligently about important questions.  Being active in class discussions is crucial to developing this habit and disposition.  Therefore, attendance is required, and your grade may be lowered by one-third grade (e.g., a B- to a C+) for each absence after three, regardless of the reason for the absence. This policy includes illnesses.  Mere physical presence in class does not satisfy the attendance requirement.  If you appear to sleep, to work on other subjects, or to talk without permission during class, you may be marked absent for that day.  You should be seated and ready for class when class begins.

 

Academic honesty

Plagiarism is a serious moral offense. All written work must be formatted and documented in MLA Style. Students who plagiarize will fail the class. See the English Division Plagiarism Statement below. We will discuss these issues at length before the first major writing assignment is due. Further, all written work submitted for credit in this class must be written originally for this class. Please see the instructor if you have concerns. Ignorance of the standards of academic honesty is not an acceptable excuse for violating these standards. Students who commit any academic dishonesty—intentionally or unintentionally—will be penalized.

 

Students with disabilities

Students who have documented their disabilities with the Dean of Student Resources are encouraged to meet privately with the instructor to discuss arrangements for their approved accommodations.

 

Conferences

I enjoy meeting with my students for a private conference; I find individual conferences to be extremely productive and well-worth the time, both for me and for the student. If at any time during the semester you have concerns about a class policy or procedure or your performance in the class, please set up a time to meet with me.

 

English Division Plagiarism Policy

According to the Ohio Dominican University Student Handbook, “When a student submits work purporting to be his/her own, but which borrows ideas, organization, wording, or anything else from some other source without an appropriate acknowledgment of that fact, the student is guilty of plagiarism.”  

 

Plagiarism can be either unintentional or intentional.  Unintentional plagiarism is the result of faulty citation procedures, and English 110 and 111 are designed to provide you with the knowledge and experience to cite sources properly.  Students who did not take these courses at Ohio Dominican University are responsible for familiarizing themselves with appropriate methods of documentation.

 

Intentional plagiarism is another matter.  Writers who knowingly submit someone else’s writing as their own are guilty of the most serious of academic offenses.  It can damage, even end, a career in academics, business, or public life.  A record of college plagiarism can follow a student after graduation as surely as a record of grades.  More importantly, plagiarists do not understand the very idea of academic study and are helping to destroy its fundamental integrity.  Plagiarism undermines the validity of course grades and so cheats the academic institution, future employers, and the majority of students who do their own work at the cost of their valuable time and effort.

 

Intentional plagiarism will be dealt with severely in this course.  Students who plagiarize will receive an “F” as a final grade, and no excuses whatsoever will be accepted.  A common excuse after the discovery of plagiarism is that a friend or family member “helped” in the writing of the work submitted.  Such assistance is acceptable only at the level of review and advice—the same procedure that takes place in classroom peer review and through the assistance of an instructor.  Any use of another’s words or ideas must be cited or considered plagiarism.  The work submitted, while it may be reviewed for suggestions by others, must be your own, or must be properly cited if it is not.  See the Student Handbook for a full discussion of this issue.

 

The Worldwide Web has made the issue of plagiarism still more complex.  Essays on virtually every subject are available for sale or in library archives.  Be fully aware that college instructors know this, and they know the sites where such material can be downloaded.   

 

To avoid the entire problem of tracing sources, this course will employ the oral defense of student work, a standard procedure of graduate school study.  If the instructor determines that the student has plagiarized work, an oral defense of that work will be required.  Before the course instructor, the student will be asked to demonstrate a full knowledge of the essay.  That will include all the vocabulary used, the concepts discussed, the examples cited, and any other ideas or issues that the paper presents.  Such questions will be easy to answer for the original writer.  If the oral defense demonstrates that the work, or any part of it, is not the student’s own, the student will fail the course.

 

Course Calendar

Please note: Assignments are due on the day on which they appear on the calendar. This calendar is subject to revision (with due notice) at any point during the semester.

 

Tuesday, September 6

The Aeneid, Books 1 and 2

Thursday, September 8

The Aeneid, Books 4 and 6

Scene Presentation:

Tuesday, September 13

The Aeneid, Books 7 and 8

Scene Presentation:

Thursday, September 15

The Aeneid, Book 12

Coriolanus, Act I

In class, work with ODU Columbus papers.

Tuesday, September 20

Coriolanus, Act II and Act III

Scene Presentation:

Thursday, September 22

Coriolanus, Act IV and Act V

Scene Presentation:

Tuesday, September 27

Cato, Prologue and Act I-Act II

Scene Presentation:

Thursday, September 29

Cato, Act III-Act V and Epilogue

Scene Presentation:

Tuesday, October 4

Corinne, 5-108

Short Essay Due

Thursday, October 6

Corinne, 109-201

Scene Presentation:

Tuesday, October 11

Corinne, 202-304

Scene Presentation:

Thursday, October 13

Corinne, 305-end

Scene Presentation:

Tuesday, October 18

Romantic Poetry: Wordsworth, “Lines (Tintern Abbey)” 25-29; Coleridge, “Frost at Midnight” 100-01; Shelley, “Hymn to Intellectual Beauty” 145-47; Keats, “Ode on a Grecian Urn” 218-19 and “Ode on Melancholy” 223-24

Scene Presentation:

Thursday, October 20

Keats and Shelley House—Admission €3.50 per person

Long Essay Due

Tuesday, October 25

Romantic Poetry: Keats, “The Eve of St. Agnes”205-16; Shelley, “Adonais”165-79

Scene Presentation:

Thursday, October 27

Excerpts from Twain, The Innocents Abroad (handout)

Excerpts from Dickens, Pictures from Italy (handout)

Scene Presentation:

Tuesday, November 1

The Marble Faun, 3-88

Scene Presentation:

Thursday, November 3

The Marble Faun, 89-179

Scene Presentation:

Tuesday, November 8

The Marble Faun, 180-267

Scene Presentation:

Thursday, November 10

The Marble Faun, 268-end

Scene Presentation:

Tuesday, November 15

Daisy Miller, 40-79

Short Essay Due—e-mail to ODU Columbus (copied to me) by start of class

Thursday, November 17

Daisy Miller, 80-end

Wharton, “Roman Fever” (handout)

Tuesday, November 22

TBA

Thursday, November 25

Final Exam—Final Short Essay due today

 

 

 

 

English 348C: Biographic Art

LEAD Adult Degree Program

Ohio Dominican University

Dr. Michelle Ruggaber Dougherty

 

Please see LEAD Program Student Guide for Course Description, Course Objectives and Outcomes, and Required Texts.

 

Course Requirements

 

Grading Scale

 

 

 

Four Two-Page Reflection Papers

10%

A

95-100

C

73-76

Six Quizzes

10%

A-

92-94

C-

70-72

Oral Briefing

10%

B+

89-91

D+

68-69

Issues in Life Writing Essay

20%

B

84-88

D

65-67

Researched Analytical Essay

35%

B-

80-83

D-

60-64

Ongoing Group Presentations

10%

C+

77-79

F

59 and below

 

Course Policies

 

Guidelines for Written Work

·         All written work should be typed, using Times New Roman 12 pt. font and 1” margins.

·         All written work must be submitted both as a hard copy and electronically as an e-mail attachment. If you are not using Microsoft Word, make sure your document is saved in Rich Text Format.

·         Ohio Dominican University has adopted as its style sheet the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, sixth edition. It is required that essays are written according to this standard. All references, citations, and formats for submitted work must follow the MLA standard.

·         All essays submitted for this course should be devoid of grammatical and spelling errors.  Complete sentences should be used. 

·         All written work submitted will be graded on both composition and content.

·         Submission of late work will be penalized ½ letter grade (i.e. B to B-) for each calendar day it is late.

·         Plagiarism of any type and in any amount will not be tolerated.  Any plagiarized work will receive a failing grade. Please check with me if you have any questions about proper citation prior to submitting your work. Chapter 2 of your MLA Handbook explains plagiarism in detail.

 

Guidelines for Quizzes

Each class will begin with a brief 10 point quiz on that day’s reading assignment(s). Quizzes will be designed to test reading comprehension and will require knowledge of details from the text. The lowest quiz grade will be dropped and no make up quizzes will be given. The quiz will begin promptly at the start of class. Late arrivals will not be permitted extra time.

 

Guidelines for Project Teams

·         Each team project for this course should represent a culmination of the efforts of each member of the project team. No one person should be held responsible for the work assigned.

·         All team assignments should reflect the total collaboration and participation of its individual members.

·         Each member’s total participation becomes the responsibility of the entire team and will be reflected in the grade.

 

Attendance

Attendance contributes significantly to success in this program. In addition to impacting the learning process, irregular attendance also affects financial aid. Students must contact the course instructor when missing a class is necessary and make arrangements for the submission of missed assignments due to the absence. A lower course grade will occur when one absence occurs. A course failure will occur when two absences occur.  

 

The last Saturday following the last regularly scheduled class meeting session should be reserved as a make-up date in the unlikely event of a class session postponement.

 

Course Calendar

Please note: Assignments are due on the day on which they appear on the calendar. This calendar is subject to revision (with due notice) at any point during the semester.

 

Class One (March 27)

 

Individual:

Read I, Claudius.

 

Note: The family relationships in I, Claudius are very complex. See this website for a family tree: http://www.historyinfilm.com/claudius/famtree4.htm.

 

Response Paper (see Student Guide p. 24 for guidelines):

Ideally, response papers will lead into your longer papers. You are, therefore, encouraged to base each response on one or more of the prompts listed in your Student Guide description of the “Issues in Life Writing” Essay. You will need to focus these general prompts into more specific points based on your readings. You must also offer textual support for the points you make in your response.

 

Project Team:

There are no project team assignments due for Class One.

 

Class Two (April 10)

 

Individual:

Read all of Franklin’s autobiography and the Lincoln photobiography.

Write and submit the Response Paper (see details under Class One).

 

Project Team:

Prepare a group presentation on some aspect of the readings relating to the course theme and present it to the rest of the class for discussion and critique. Look to the prompts listed in the “Issues in Life Writing” description in your Student Guide for a starting point.

 

Peer edit the response papers.

 

Begin discussing potential ideas for the “Issues in Life Writing” paper (page 25 in the Student Guide). Write a short report about your progress (about 1 paragraph per team member). These papers are individual projects. The essay may be based on an earlier response, but should be longer, more developed, and more detailed.

 

Class Three (April 17)

 

Individual:

Read the preface and Parts 2 and 3 of Dorothy Day’s autobiography, The Long Loneliness.

 

Read Ray Kroc’s autobiography, Grinding it Out.

 

Write and submit the two-page, typed Response Paper.

 

Project Team:

Discuss the two readings for this class.

 

Prepare a group presentation on some aspect of the readings relating to the course theme and present it to the rest of the class for discussion and critique.

 

Explore Dorothy Day and Ray Kroc and issues relating to their times on the Internet. Be prepared to share your findings with the class.

 

Class Four (April 24)

 

Individual:

Read Booker T. Washington’s autobiography and Section One, “My Story Ends in Freedom,” in Conway’s Written By Herself: Autobiographies of American Women.

 

Write and submit the four- to five-page, typed “Issues in Life Writing” Essay. 

(Refer to the Appendix.) 

 

Project Team:

Discuss the texts and prepare questions to help start class discussion on the texts.

 

Compare and contrast life writing about Franklin and Lincoln with life writing about the disenfranchised.

 

Use peer review and peer editing to critique clarity of thesis, development of thesis, quality of supporting evidence, style, and grammar and mechanics of the “Issues in Life Writing” Essay.

 

Class Five (May 1)

 

Individual:

Read Section Three, “Arts and Letters,” in Conway’s Written By Herself: Autobiographies of American Women.

 

Write and submit the two-page, typed Response Paper.

 

Project Team:

Discuss how narrative creates identity, (i.e., a sense of self). Be prepared to share your discussion with the class.

 

Discuss the following quotation: “Through art, history can be accurately portrayed and understood better than it might be through mere historians. In fact, artists are the true historians for they attempt to separate truth from the bare facts of history. Only through art can one see both sides of history, not just the side of the victors who dominate the texts of written records.” [Brook Thomas] What are the strengths and weaknesses of writing history “historically” versus through art?

 

Continue using the techniques of peer editing to improve the final paper, the Researched Analytical Essay.  (Refer to the Appendix.)

 

Class Six (May 8)

Individual:

Read Section Two, “Research is a Passion with Me: Women Scientists and Physicians” in Conway’s Written By Herself: Autobiographies of American Women.

 

Prepare a three- to five-minute oral presentation supported by technology (PowerPoint or other visual program) designed to share your research with other class members.

 

Write and submit “Researched Analytical Essay.”

 

Project Team:

Discuss how the text supports the essential theme of the class: “Fictions of the Self: Biography, Autobiography, and the Creation of Identity.”

 

Assist one another as peer editors in improving the final essays.